Bombay HC strikes down CBI Court’s observation in Yes Bank Case

Latest News

On Tuesday, the High Court of Bombay struck down observations made by the special CBI Court, that offences of cheating & criminal breach of trust were “made out” against all the accused in the Yes Bank fraud case.

Central Bureau of Investigation has booked Yes Bank co-founder Rana Kapur & Dewan Housing Finance Limited (DHFL) promoters Kapil Wadhawan & Dheeraj Wadhawan under sections 420 (cheating) & 120B (conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) & sections 7 (public servant taking gratification), 12 (abetment of offences), & 13(2) (criminal misconduct) r/w. 13(1)(d) (obtaining any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage by any corrupt or illegal means or by abusing position) of the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act, 1988.

However, on July 17, the special CBI court found that CBI had not applied to obtain sanction to prosecute the accused persons under provisions of the PC Act, as required under section 19 of the said Act. It remitted the case for trial to the metropolitan magistrate concerned & observed that the charges under the IPC sections were close to being proved.

The CBI Court had said that it would not be proper & legal to keep the proceedings pending for an indefinite period in the hopes that the prosecution would apply for sanction in regards to the PC act charges.

The Wadhawans had moved the High Court, taking strong exception to the observation, contending that it was likely to cause prejudice against them.

Read also : No Wildlife Clearance Required For Projects Which Don’t Need Environmental Clearance: Environment Ministry

Justice Anuja Prabhudessai found substance in their objection. The judge said the observation was made without any application of mind, as on the relevant date, the special court only considered the aspect of want of sanction to prosecute & remitted the matter to the magistrate.

The Judge said that “It is thus evident that the impugned observations have been made for the purpose of remitting the proceedings to the metropolitan magistrate, & that there was no application of mind for arriving at a prima facie conclusion that offences under sections 420, 409 r/w 120B of the IPC are in fact, made out against all the accused”.

“The apprehension of the applicants, that these observations may leave no discretion unto the learned metropolitan magistrate… cannot be said to be baseless,” she said & clarified that the magistrate shall proceed with the matter without being influenced by the observation. 

Read also :Pak court appoints 3 senior lawyers as amicus curiae in Jadhav case

Source Link

Leave a Reply